Volcker rule trading account test
On December 10,the U. The proscription is subject to exceptions that volcker rule trading account test limited investments in such volcker rule trading account test, as well as exemptions that permit banking entities to engage in organizational and offering activities and to provide investment management, prime brokerage and other services to such funds under certain conditions. Notably, while an original focus of the Volcker Rule was to protect insured banks from essentially using federal deposit insurance as a safety net for bad investments, the final regulations are not only applicable to banking organizations that carry FDIC deposit insurance and their owners, but also foreign banks with banking operations that do not carry FDIC insurance.
This does not, therefore, include foreign entities that make loans from outside of the United States. The Volcker Rule does apply to every foreign entity that directly or indirectly maintains a bank branch or agency in the United States, or controls a commercial lending company.
The Volcker Rule does not apply to entities whose contacts with the United States do not require licensed agencies or branches. For example, foreign banks that maintain only volcker rule trading account test offices in the United States are not subject to the Volcker Rule.
The establishment by U. Ownership by a foreign bank that has no U. It also requires that foreign financial institutions continuously assess the totality of their U. A trading account can generally be contrasted with an investment account that is maintained for longer term appreciation. If a banking entity calculates risk-based capital ratios under the market risk capital rule, trading of financial instruments that are both market risk capital covered positions and trading positions or related hedges constitute proprietary trading.
Purchases and sales of financial instruments for its own account by a registered dealer, swap dealer or security-based swap dealer affiliate for any purpose within the scope of its dealing activities constitutes proprietary trading. These types of activities conducted outside of the United States also constitute proprietary trading. Therefore, subject to the exemptions discussed below, all trading activities by registered broker-dealers and their foreign equivalents, such as Canadian investment dealers, are subject to this prohibition.
In addition, a purchase and sale of a financial instrument is subject to a rebuttable presumption that it is for the trading account of a banking entity if it is held for fewer than 60 days volcker rule trading account test the risk of the financial instrument is substantially transferred within such period.
However, the Agencies did not adopt the converse of this presumption. Therefore, a purchase or sale of a financial instrument that is held for more than 60 days does not necessarily mean that it is not for the trading account of a banking entity. Although there are limited exemptions to the broad ban on proprietary trading for banking entities, for foreign entities, the Agencies have crafted two important exemptions that help mitigate the extraterritorial effects of the proprietary trading prohibition.
The proprietary trading prohibition does not apply to financial instruments that are sovereign debt obligations including debt obligations of multinational central banks, such as the European Central Bank, of which the foreign sovereign is a memberincluding obligations of agencies and political subdivisions of that sovereign, in cases in which:.
A similar exemption is afforded to a foreign entity that is a foreign bank or regulated by the foreign sovereign as a securities dealer, even if controlled by a top-tier U. The Agencies noted, however, with respect to this exemption, that they intend to monitor activity of banking entities to ensure that U. The foregoing exemption provides a weak parallel to the full exemption under the U.
The final version of this exemption significantly expands on the exemption that had been proposed and that had been widely criticized by the international banking community. However, the Agencies still placed a number of conditions on the availability of the foreign banking exemption, as outlined below. The foreign banking exemption is applicable to the purchase and sale of any financial instrument if:.
While personnel located in the United States acting for the foreign entity cannot be involved in soliciting, arranging, negotiating, making the decision to transact, or executing a transaction, personnel performing back office functions, such as clearing and settlement, would be able to do so in the United States. However, the foreign banking entity is not treated as being located in the United States solely by virtue of operating or controlling such an office or subsidiary. There are also certain other exemptions that may volcker rule trading account test available to foreign entities, including heavily conditioned exemptions for:.
Underwriting activities of a banking entity are exempted from the proprietary trading prohibitions only if:. Unlike the SEC Regulation M definition of distribution governing purchases and offers to purchase during a distribution and market stabilizationthe definition used in the Volcker Rule excludes the magnitude of the offering as a relevant factor.
Engaging in the following activities may indicate that a banking entity is acting as an underwriter as part of a distribution of securities:. Thus, this exemption will potentially affect local underwriting practices of banking entities on a worldwide basis unless, instead, the foreign banking exemption, discussed above, can be utilized.
It will also apply to Rule Volcker rule trading account test transactions not conducted on a riskless principal basis. For firms that effect a foreign public offering in conjunction with a U.
If this is the case, then foreign underwriting practices would not be affected by the limitations in the underwriting exemption.
This position is consistent with the non-integration volcker rule trading account test these offerings for U. However, it remains uncertain whether dually-registered personnel of these distinct entities located outside of the United Statesacting in distinct capacities, can be used in both distributions. These matters will need to be clarified with the staff of the functional regulators. This position may potentially apply in the case of offerings using the Volcker rule trading account test.
If these offerings can be viewed as distinct, separate exemptions could also be utilized. However, in many of these cases, dually volcker rule trading account test personnel are utilized, so clarification concerning this issue will be needed. Since such compensation arrangements are common in Canadian and other foreign investment banking transactions, the foreign banking exemption may instead be useful in this context with the foreign investment banking affiliate exclusively receiving such compensation.
Such compensation could be received for the investment account of a U. As noted above, another exemption from the ban on proprietary trading was created for market-making related activities. Market making-related activities are exempted from the proprietary trading ban if:. Under this exemption, affiliated broker-dealers would need to be approved by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
In addition to being appropriately registered in this manner, the broker-dealer would need to demonstrate consistency and substantial market-making activity, whether effected on an exchange, alternative trading systems or in other over-the-counter markets, either domestically or in foreign markets, in order to rely on this exemption. Thus, practices such as withdrawing from market making during periods of market stress or auto-quoting volcker rule trading account test from the market may disqualify a firm from relying on the exemption if not combined with robust bona fide market-making activities.
The prohibition on proprietary trading also exempts risk-mitigating hedging activities. These activities are permitted in connection with, and related to, individual or aggregated positions, contracts, or other holdings of the banking entity that are designed to reduce the specific risks to the banking entity in such connection.
Volcker rule trading account test hedging activities of a banking entity are permitted if the following conditions are met:. As noted above, the determination of whether an activity or strategy is risk-reducing or mitigating volcker rule trading account test be made at the inception of the hedging activity. Notwithstanding the exemptions from the proprietary trading ban described above, transactions will be deemed to be impermissible if they:.
However, the amount of capital volcker rule trading account test risk in a transaction, whether or not the transaction can be hedged, the amount of leverage present in the transaction and the general financial condition of the banking entity engaging in the transaction, should be considered.
A similar interest consists of an interest:. Ownership Interest expressly excludes performance compensation to investment managers and other service providers to the covered fund and their employees or former employees, provided that any holdback is used solely for the purpose of satisfying contractual claw back rights and the holdback reserve does not share in subsequent performance.
Such interests must generally be non-transferrable, except to affiliates, immediate family members or in connection with the sale of the business to an unaffiliated entity that provides such services.
The Volcker Rule also expressly provides that certain activities are permitted notwithstanding the general prohibition. A banking entity is permitted to make initial investments in a covered fund that it sponsors, including acting as the governing body for such entity, if:. The final volcker rule trading account test imposes per Fund and aggregate de minimis limits on banking entity investments in covered funds.
For fund of funds structures, compliance is measured only with regard to master funds and not individual feeder funds. The greater of the amount contributed to covered funds and the fair market value of such interests must be deducted from Tier 1 Capital. An exemption similar to the exemption for permitted risk-mitigating hedging activities in the proprietary trading prohibition is also provided for permitted covered fund activities. Calls and puts options examples banking organizations are not subject to the prohibitions on covered fund activities if the following among other requirements are satisfied:.
An activity or investment occurs solely outside of the United States if: Thus, considerably more flexibility is provided to foreign banking organizations, through reliance on a combination of the seeding period exemption and the foreign covered fund activity exemption, than is provided to U.
In this way, the relationship between a banking entity and a covered fund is subject to the same prohibitions on affiliated transactions as are non-covered fund affiliates of a U.
All such transactions are required to be entered into on terms that are comparable to those entered into with unaffiliated entities. If a banking entity enters into a prime brokerage transaction with a covered fund, the chief executive officer of the banking entity must certify annually with a duty to update that the banking entity does not, directly or indirectly guarantee, assume or otherwise insure the obligations or performance of the covered funds or of any covered fund in which it invests.
Banking entities that do not engage in any Volcker Rule covered activities are not required to establish a Volcker Rule compliance program. For foreign banking volcker rule trading account test, it is sufficient if the U. Banking entities that are engaged in significant trading must furnish periodic reports to their primary regulatory agencies on a range of quantitative measurements regarding their proprietary trading.
Scott Publication March Introduction On December 10,the U. As used in the Volcker Rule, financial instruments consist of the following: Foreign Sovereign Debt Exemption The proprietary trading prohibition does not apply to financial instruments that are sovereign debt obligations including debt obligations volcker rule trading account test multinational central banks, such as the European Central Bank, of which the foreign sovereign is a memberincluding obligations of agencies and political subdivisions of that sovereign, in cases in which: The foreign banking exemption is applicable to the purchase and sale of any financial instrument if: The banking volcker rule trading account test is not organized or directly or indirectly controlled volcker rule trading account test a banking entity organized in the United States; The foreign banking organization e.
This will impose a human resources constraint volcker rule trading account test foreign banking entities since personnel will need to be based outside of the United States even if U.
As noted above, the Volcker Rule added two additional exemptions for transactions by a foreign bank with unaffiliated market intermediaries such as unaffiliated registered broker-dealersthus preserving the prohibition on entering into a proprietary trading transaction with an affiliated U. If the market intermediary is acting as agent, then the transaction also must be conducted anonymously on an exchange or trading facility.
The Agencies have acknowledged that an anonymous trade could result in a transaction between a foreign bank and its U. Nevertheless, many foreign banking entities will need to reorganize their methods of executing transactions in U.
Thus, foreign entities are substantially denied the benefits of having an affiliated U. Related hedges effected in the United States will also have to be effected with unaffiliated U.
This will increase execution costs and complexities for foreign banks. Foreign banks will also, as a result, be forced to disclose sensitive proprietary volcker rule trading account test information to unaffiliated U.
There are also certain other exemptions that may be available to foreign entities, including heavily conditioned exemptions for: Certain of these other exemptions are discussed in the sections that follow. Underwriting Exemption Underwriting activities of a banking entity are exempted from the proprietary trading prohibitions only if:
Regulators presented proposed regulations regarding the Rule on October 11, and gave the public until February 13, to submit comments.
Finally, on December 10,all five regulators approved the final regulations and these were published in the Federal Register in January, as an interim final regulation. Institutions within the volcker rule trading account test of the Rule must now begin finalizing strategies related to further involvement with activities regulated under the Rule.
The premise of the Rule is that banking entities 2 should be prohibited from trading or owning "risky assets. Each of these prohibitions contains complex definitions as well as exemptions. The Rule is intended to permit banking entities to continue critical client-oriented financial services, subject to appropriate risk management. Proprietary Trading Prohibition on Proprietary Trading The Rule prohibits any banking entity from engaging in proprietary trading.
The main purpose of this prohibition is to limit the risk-taking by banking entities as they try to profit by trading in "risky assets". The broad prohibition against proprietary trading and the various exemptions to it are each the subject of complex definitional provisions. Institutions which determine to avail themselves of exemptions must undertake extensive internal compliance programs and the adoption of detailed policies and procedures at the individual trading desk level.
Finally, larger banking entities will be obligated under the regulations to capture and calculate transaction and position data on a variety of quantitative metrics on a daily basis and to report such data to regulators.
Definitions "Proprietary trading" is defined as "engaging as principal for the trading account of the banking entity in any purchase or sale volcker rule trading account test one or more financial instruments.
However, the definition excludes loans, most commodities as opposed to commodity futures and foreign exchange or currency. There are three different tests used to determine what constitutes a "trading account. Trading accounts consist of any one of the following:. Exclusions from the Definition of "Proprietary Trading" Notwithstanding the scope of the definition of proprietary trading outlined above, there are significant exclusions from the definition.
These exclusions refer to purchases and sales of financial instruments: Exemptions from the Prohibition on Proprietary Trading In addition to activities which are excluded from the definition of proprietary trading, the Rule sets forth several exemptions from the general prohibition.
These exemptions generally contain significant conditions, including documentation and compliance requirements, and related definitions. Following is a summary of volcker rule trading account test exemptions: A banking entity is permitted to engage in underwriting activities only if i the banking entity is acting as an underwriter for a distribution of securities 6 and the trading desk's underwriting position is related to such distribution, ii the amount and type of securities in the trading desk's underwriting position are designed not to exceed the reasonably expected near term demands of clients, customers or counterparties, and reasonable efforts are made to sell or otherwise reduce volcker rule trading account test underwriting position within a reasonable time period, volcker rule trading account test into account the liquidity, maturity, and depth of the market for the relevant type of security, iii the banking entity maintains compliance policies and procedures directed to compliance at the trading desk level, 7 iv the compensation arrangements of underwriting personnel are designed not to reward or incentivize prohibited proprietary trading, and v the banking entity is licensed or registered to conduct the underwriting activities.
A banking entity is permitted to engage in hedging activity designed to reduce or otherwise significantly mitigate, and demonstrably reduces or otherwise significantly mitigates one or more specific, identifiable risks, including market risk, counterparty or other credit risk, currency or foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, commodity price risk, basis risk or similar risks, arising in connection with and related to identified positions, contracts, or other holdings of the banking entity, provided that i the hedge does not give rise to any significant new or additional risk which is not concurrently volcker rule trading account test and ii the hedge is subject to continuing review, monitoring and management by the banking entity.
This exemption is also conditioned upon the maintenance of an effective compliance program, and extensive documentation requirements at the trading desk level. Similar limits on compensation arrangements for hedging personnel are required.
Other exemptions from the prohibition on proprietary trading. The Rule provides certain other exemptions, each with their own conditions and requirements, which pertain to i trading in domestic government obligations, ii trading in foreign government obligations, iii trading on behalf of customers, iv trading by a regulated insurance company and v trading by foreign volcker rule trading account test entities.
The exemptions to the proprietary trading prohibition are subject to several broad limitations: Covered Funds Activities and Investments Prohibition on Acquiring or Retaining an Ownership Interest in and Having Certain Relationships with a Covered Fund The Rule provides that "a banking entity may not, as principal, directly or indirectly, acquire or retain any ownership interest in or sponsor a covered fund.
Exclusions The Rule does not apply to banking entities acting:. Definitions A "covered fund" is a private investment company, 9 a private commodity pool, 10 or an offshore entity controlled by a U. This exclusion enables investment advisers to collect some forms of carried interests from funds without application of the Rule. A banking entity which securitizes asset-backed securities and is subject to Dodd-Frank's rules on risk retention for securitizers is granted some relief from the foregoing conditions.
It is not necessary for the banking entity to be engaged in bona fide trust, fiduciary investment advisory or commodity trading advisory services and it is not necessary to limit the offering to the banking entity's customers. A banking entity is also permitted to engage in underwriting and market-making activities involving a covered fund so long as: Exemptions for Permitted Investments in Covered Funds Notwithstanding the Rule's prohibitions on acquiring and retaining ownership interests in covered funds, a banking entity may acquire and retain such ownership interests in a covered fund for the purpose of either i establishing the fund and providing the fund with sufficient initial equity for investment to permit the fund to attract unaffiliated investors or ii making de minimis investments.
Each of these activities is subject to limitations. As noted above, ownership interests in connection with underwriting and market-making activities are included in these calculations. Although the per fund and aggregate limits apply to the aggregate holdings of the banking entities and their affiliates, the Rule excludes from the determination of holdings the holdings of certain registered investment companies, business development companies and foreign public funds which might be considered affiliates of the banking entity.
Exemptions for Permitted Risk-Mitigating Hedging Activities The Rule provides a very narrow exemption for investments in a covered fund which reduce risk to the banking entity arising from an employee compensation arrangement that is tied to the performance of the covered fund. The hedging activity must demonstrably reduce or significantly mitigate one or more specific risks arising in connection with the compensation arrangement with an employee who directly provides investment advisory, commodity trading advisory or other services to the covered fund.
The investment may not give rise to any significant new or additional risk which is not itself contemporaneously hedged. The Rule also requires the banking entity to implement and enforce an internal compliance program that includes reasonably designed policies and procedures, internal controls and ongoing monitoring, management and authorization procedures.
In addition, the compensation arrangement to which the volcker rule trading account test relates must provide that any losses incurred by the banking entity on the hedge be offset by a reduction in the amounts payable to the employee. Exemptions for Certain Permitted Covered Fund Activities and Investments Outside of the United States A banking entity may acquire or retain an ownership interest in, or sponsor, a covered fund if: Exemptions for Permitted Covered Fund Interests and Activities by a Regulated Insurance Company An insurance company may acquire or retain an ownership interest in, or sponsor, a covered fund if: Limitations on Relationships with a Covered Fund Generally, no banking entity that serves as the investment manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor or sponsor to a covered fund, that organizes and offers a covered fund as permitted by the Rule or that continues to volcker rule trading account test an ownership interest as permitted by the Rule, may enter into a transaction with the covered fund that would be a covered transaction 22 under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, assuming that the banking entity were a member bank and the covered fund were an affiliate.
However, the Rule provides exceptions for the acquisition and retention of ownership interests as permitted by the Rule and also for certain prime brokerage transactions.
A banking entity which serves as the volcker rule trading account test manager, investment adviser, commodity trading advisor or sponsor to a covered fund must comply with the restrictions on transactions between member banks and affiliates imposed under 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, assuming that the banking entity were a member bank and the covered fund were an affiliate. In this context, a volcker rule trading account test entity can mitigate a conflict of interest, and proceed with the transaction, through timely and effective disclosure of the conflict, volcker rule trading account test through established, adequate information barriers.
Compliance Each banking entity is required to develop a program reasonably designed to ensure and monitor compliance with the prohibitions on proprietary trading and covered fund activities and investments. The terms, scope, and detail of the compliance program must be appropriate for the type, size, scope, and complexity of activities and business structure of the entity. The minimum requirements for all banking entities include:.
Certain large banking entities 24 engaged in proprietary trading are subject to "enhanced compliance" requirements. These entities are required to establish, maintain, and enforce a governance and management framework that is reasonably designed to ensure that appropriate personnel are responsible and accountable for the effective implementation and enforcement of the compliance program, a clear reporting line with a chain of responsibility, and the periodic review of the compliance program by senior management.
A significantly broader group 25 of banking entities engaged in proprietary trading will be required to report quantitative metrics on their trading activities.
Effective Date and Compliance Dates The Rule became effective April 1,but affected banking organizations generally will have until July 21, to bring their proprietary trading and private fund activities into conformance with the Volcker rule trading account test.
This new conformance date is an administrative extension of the original statutory conformance date of July 21, Volcker rule trading account test, the deadline for conformance by banking entities in connection with loan securitizations will be extended to July 21, with regard to their ownership interests in, and sponsorship of, any loan securitizations that had been in place as of December 31, An important exception to the extension is that banking organizations with significant trading activities will be required to report quantitative metrics on their trading activities beginning in July In addition, banking organizations are expected to engage in "good faith efforts" to bring all of their volcker rule trading account test activities into compliance by the July conformance date.
To this end, the Federal Reserve Board has warned that "banking entities should not expand activities and make investments during the conformance period with an expectation that additional time to conform those activities or investments will be granted. Critics of the Rule foresaw a reduction in the efficiency of markets, economic growth and employment as a result of loss of liquidity.
Further negative forecasts included high transition costs as non-banking entities assumed trading activities currently performed by banking entities, a reduction in commercial output and resource exploration due to a lack of volcker rule trading account test counterparties, and reduced access volcker rule trading account test debt markets. Supporters of the Rule emphasized that restrictions in proprietary trading may reduce systemic risk and lower the probability of another financial crisis.
The volcker rule trading account test contend that the Rule as promulgated achieves a balance between promoting healthy economic activity and reducing regulatory burdens where appropriate.
Time will tell whether the right balance has been achieved. This article summarizes in broad outline the principal provisions of the Volcker Rule. The Rule itself is heavily detailed and qualified, and has been nuanced by substantial commentary submitted by the regulatory agencies responsible for the Rule.
Application of the Rule volcker rule trading account test specific circumstances will require a review of pertinent provisions of the Rule in greater detail than that present in this article. There are exclusions for "covered funds" as hereinafter defined and certain portfolio companies and portfolio concerns which might be considered affiliates or subsidiaries of banking entities in any of volcker rule trading account test first three categories above.
There is also an exclusion for the FDIC acting in its corporate capacity or as a conservator or receiver for a banking entity. Ownership interests may not be "predominantly owned" by the banking entity or the issuer or their respective affiliates, directors and employees. A loan securitization generally may not include securities. Trading accounts consist of any one of the following: No transaction or activity is permissible if it would involve or result in a material conflict of interest between the banking entity and its clients, customers, or counterparties.
No transaction or activity is permissible if it would result, directly or indirectly, in a material exposure by the banking entity to a high-risk asset or a high-risk trading strategy. No volcker rule trading account test or activity is permissible if it would pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the banking entity or to the financial stability of the United States.
Exclusions The Rule does not apply to banking entities acting: The minimum requirements for all banking entities include: